✎ YUKOKI
I Apologize in Advance for My Stupidity;
Depression is Difficult;

the-woman-of-belgravia:

gaaraofsburbia:

james-p-sullivan:

HEY TUMBLR

DID YOU GUYS KNOW JENGA MADE A NEW VERSION OF THEIR GAME, BUT INSTEAD OF STRAIGHT BORING WOODEN ONES, ITS TETRIS PIECES

THATS RIGHT, ITS MOTHER FUCKING TETRIS JENGA

image

THE TWO OF THE MOST STRESSFUL GOD DAMNED GAMES WE PLAYED AS CHILDREN ROLLED INTO ONE

#you either win or die

rattietayls:

Why We Need Feminism - Taylor Eldredge

i. unrealistic expectations

ii. victim blaming

iii. the wage gap

disloyalorderofbuffaloes:

people that demean and belittle and make fun of religion and religious people are literally so gross like whats your deal youre a gross little person 

nextyearsgirl:

stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

Leviticus 20:13:

If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Nice try, Colbert.

Leviticus was written approximately 1400 years before Jesus’ birth.

Nice try, artemispotter.

Old Testament =/= New Testament. Seriously. Also, Leviticus also commands you to learn the Torah, which, if you’re getting Old and New confused, you clearly haven’t.

Not to mention the other ridiculous laws in Leviticus (and Deuteronomy, as well), including the following:

  • No mixing of different types of fabric
  • No having sex with a woman on her period
  • Curse your mother or father? You must be killed
  • Disabled people cannot worship God 
  • Stubborn children should be stoned.

So…. still want to argue how valid the OT is?

Also, in the Bible!=Jesus said it, anyway.  Even in the NT, there are a lot of people who aren’t Jesus giving their opinions.

Truth.  

Only if the words are in red (in many translations) does it mean that Jesus said it.

FWIW, the apostle Paul and I would not have been friends.  Mortal enemies is more like it.

Hey, guys, remember that one time when Jesus declared Levitican law irrelevant?

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless (for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.

-Hebrews 7:18-19.

Having been Jewish for, you know, ever, I am endlessly amused at the Christian Right’s reliance on Leviticus. Even I, who didn’t understand the theological difference between Catholics and Protestants until I took a course on Christianity in college, knew that Jesus was totes anti-Leviticus.

Seriously, people…

^^^^^^^

Ugh thank you. Fellow Christian here. I’ve literally NEVER understood this logic. “hey guys let’s pick one arbitrary part of leviticus to harp on and ignore the fact that 99% of the new testament explicitly tells us the old covenants/laws no longer hold true”

I love it when self-professed “Christians” don’t know the ABSOLUTELY MOST SIMPLE basics of the difference between the Old and New Testament. If you are against gay marriage because of Leviticus, you should also keep kosher and be against tattoos. Otherwise you’re just another FLAMING HYPOCRITE.

-Jess

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

/An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

hexgoddess:

see-reverse-side:

hexgoddess:

What? Bisexual? She can’t be bisexual, you’re only bisexual if you’re actively fucking two people of two differing genders at the same exact time. The moment you stop fucking them you’re suddenly not bi anymore. It’s science.

I suppose that means we bi people exist in quantum superposition until someone observes us having sex.

Schrodinger’s Sexuality

gaymommy:

aubreygraharn:

mrscreamguy:

So, you know how some Nicki Minaj fans don’t know why we hate her?

image

Also, she said misandry isn’t real

So, basically, fuck her.

ThIS THE FUNNEIST POST I’VE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE

image

kenzby:

college kids going home for break

Reasons why i'm single
ONE: i annoy people
TWO: i'm never anyones first choice
THREE: i fuck shit up
FOUR: i'm just bad with relationships
FIVE: i'm not liked
SIX: I am an ugly ass mother fucker
don't forget
SEVEN: i spend my whole life locked away in a dark room with food and a laptop
Anonymous whispered:
I'm 19 and my girlfriend is 13, everyone shames our relationship but she's just the most precious thing ever :/

ambitiousbard:

fullmetal-noodlist:

ambitiousbard:

abba-douche:

ambitiousbard:

rammdark:

spencerofspace:

ambitiousbard:

grimduck:

ambitiousbard:

okay look dude I know you don’t want to hear this

but you are 19 years old and you are dating someone who is 5 years younger than the age of consent in america. If you don’t think you’re going to at least get weird looks when you tell people this, I have some news for you.

but in time she’ll be 23 when he’s 29, number doesn’t really matter because of ageing and all, maybe just the timing?

the problem isn’t the age gap, I mean shit there was about a 5 year age gap between my step father and mother. It’s not the most extreme example but whatever.

The problem is that it’s a 19 year old legal adult dating a middle school aged child.

The probably with age difference in adolescent relationships is the rate of development. I agree that past the age of 24, a 5 head age difference isn’t a huge deal. But between 12 and 24 is when people are going through the hugest development. A 13 year old and a 19 year olds brain chemistry doesn’t even work the same. I’m not saying they couldn’t get along, but the hormone difference there is extremely significant.
I mean, you wouldn’t set a 2 year old up on a playmate with a 7 year old.
5 years is almost half of a 13 year olds life. The higher the age difference is compared to the age of the younger party is important.

My dad graduated from school when my mum was -born-

that’s real fuckin neato but the age difference isn’t the problem, the problem is that a legal fucking adult is dating somebody who should be in middle school like what is so difficult to grasp about this concept.

Ugh, why is everyone judging this relationship? You know nothing about these people except their age gap!

I’d like to point out that you reblogged this and mentioned the age gap being the problem when, on the response I posted literally right above yours, I say that the age gap is not the problem. The problem is IT’S AN ADULT DATING SOMEONE WELL UNDER THE AGE OF CONSENT AND DEFINITELY NOT DEVELOPED ENOUGH TO BE HAVING A SERIOUS RELATIONSHIP, ESPECIALLY NOT ONE WITH A LEGAL FUCKING ADULT.

Read. Please read. Go back to school. Learn how to read. Reading comprehension will save your life.

Mind you this really is bullshit.

They’re gonna get some looks because they have the fact that he’s “illegally” dating. Hell, the age of consent in the usa is a fine fucking line

like I turn 18 this year, my girlfriend turns 17. it’s pretty much gonna be illegal to date her till she turns 18 as well.

also who the hell are you to say the girl isn’t developed enough to have a serious relationship? who the fuck are you to say it’s gotten that serious?

they’re six years apart. you’re getting bent out of shape because it just goes against your assumption as to how early teenagers work as well as it goes against the law.

It’s gonna be against the law for many people anyways.

so maybe YOU need to fucking go back to school and learn common sense

I’ve finally found it

the dumbest response to all of this. It’s finally here.

TRACK NAME: Never Gonna Give You Up
ALBUM TITLE:
ARTIST: Rick Astley
TIMES PLAYED: 220,572 plays

swexual-curls:

Rick Astley - Never Gonna Give You Up

I don’t know what I expected….

postapocalypticbabe:

Shortest my hair has ever been and I love it

primeribofamerica:

we did it monsters, we made it to the monster ball

choisiwonthirstprincess:

niggas talkin about they don’t like girls wearin weaves but they got 100s of dollars worth of fitted caps tryin to hide the fact they hairlines go way back like historic landmarks

rnackenzie:

i wanna respect everybodys opinion but some peoples opinions are just so terrible